by dexeron » Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:32 pm
Seriously, it would be like if all of us had no idea what you looked like. Some said: "I think Desp is a woman." Others said "I think Desp is a man."
Of those who preached "man," some might say "I think he is clean shaven." Others would say "he has a beard."
Then, when it's shown that you were a man with a beard, those people tried to claim that they had been able to tap into some greater perception, rather than just getting lucky and guessing.
We'd immediately see how laughable that claim would be, but add thousands of years and followers, and suddenly people want to have a justification for thinking that the founders of their particular cult were more in-tune, more enlightened, more knowledgeable. I mean, if they weren't, if they were just as ignorant as every other primitive, ignorant nobody, then that might call the entire house of cards into question!
I'm not here to tell you that Buddhism is or is not anything. But the ancient Buddhists didn't know jack-shit about the nature of the universe. They were a bunch of dudes who made up some stories that appealed to them aesthetically, just like every other group did, and they happened to luckily invent a story that kind-of sort-of (if we squint real hard) matches what was eventually discovered. Stop pretending that has any greater meaning than "coincidences happen."