Random Stuff

[Despanan]

[dexeron]

[Phantomgrift]

Then Desp, you have the oddest version of the Bible I've never seen.

Yay! We're back to "Dex has nothing significant to add to the previous banter, so he'll attempt to mock Phantomgrift and fail miserably."

God, it's like you have a script.

Edit: I'm also now entertained Dex by the fact that you also apparently see random bullshit on the internet as something to be "won" or "lost".

[Despanan]

- though it's about King David, not King Solomon. My bad. The "S" in Samuel had me remember a different desert war lord.

Also - No one believes you when you claim you're trolling Phant. We've all seen you completely lose your shit over stuff people have posted on here. Hell, Emoore had to invent a term to describe your ridiculous attempts to cover up your own failures under the guise of "trolling".

[Phantomgrift]

Yes, because you are renowned for your frequent use of Biblical quotes to make a point.
Why, it's almost like you're not routinely spouting off the latest bit by Mao, Stalin or some random hippie you met at a local sit-in.

[Despanan]

[Phantomgrift]

Alas, all I've really seen you post over the last couple of months usually divides between attempts at mocking me and large sprawling posts about how awesome OWS is, or some random bit piece about some left-centered story that no one usually responds to outside of myself, HDS, and when he's feeling up to snuff, Dex.

So I can't say I see you quote much of anything on a regular basis.
Man, I wonder how the shrink would react if I told him that despite the Ativan, I want to make a epic trip to New York to seek out, befriend, and ultimately betray and kill via drowning in the ocean, some random bozo I've never met outside of through a random forum board.

It would be funny if nothing else.
Almost as funny as the notion that a corner of your mind will pick up on, convinced that I'm deadly serious about my previous statement.

[Despanan]

What's even funnier is how, by alluding to 2 Samuel 12, I've insulted you on multiple levels and you have yet to figured it out.

[Phantomgrift]

Interesting thing about Bible verses. You can look at them historically, philosophically, or literally.

I'm almost fairly certain that from a literal standpoint, I haven't taken anyone's wife as my own at any point in time. So that would leave historically, which is a bit dubious as well, or philosophically, in which case it's open to interpretation and I don't really see myself as investing to much concern into deducing your ever so clever reference.

I know that you and Dex like to routinely pat yourselves on the back over the great zingers and insults you hurl towards me, but for them to actually bother me would mean I had to find them relevant in the first place.

Besides, as "arguments" go, you're rather quick to cite whatever alleged fallacy I'm using, Dex and you both cite "winning" and "losing", and then you turn around and attempt to smugly reference Bible verses?

Heh, yeah, cause that's logical argumentation right there. I mean, my goodness, I shall deduce the error of my text and change my mind ever so quickly.... Wait, no I won't. I'll still continue to view you as a mis-guided hippie.

But by all means, continue to reveal in your smugness man. Whatever gets your rocks off or lets you sleep at night.
It's why I find you so endlessly entertaining.

[Despanan]