#foxnewsfacts
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 6:56 pm
I'm curious, is anyone in the States aware of the debacle that Fox News hosted yesterday? There was a genius moment when a so-called terrorism expert was asked about the ramifications of the Paris incidents on the rest of Europe and, amongst other absurdities, claimed that the UK's second largest city had a 100 per cent Muslim population and was a no-go area for anyone else. (It's actually about 22 per cent, and we're building a high-speed rail link there at the moment, so there better not be barriers to the rest of us getting in.)
He then said that "Muslim clothing police" beat people in parts of London if they're seen in the streets not wearing Muslim apparel, whatever that is. I'm pretty sure I'd have heard about that, given that I work there. In any event, Britain reacted in the way Britain often does to this sort of thing, by taking the piss through the #foxnewsfacts hashtag on Twitter. There are some real gems on there, although one would have to be either British or something of an Anglophile to appreciate some of the references.
But the reason I'm actually posting this is to note that, while Fox has a generally rather dubious record for factual accuracy (Obama banning doughnuts, anyone?), I find it a bit worrying that this guy's credentials as an "expert" have allowed him to address Congressional committees, even though he clearly gets some of his information from tinfoil-hat conspiracy websites. I can't imagine where else the info came from, given his claim he'd accepted it as truth from his sources.
He then said that "Muslim clothing police" beat people in parts of London if they're seen in the streets not wearing Muslim apparel, whatever that is. I'm pretty sure I'd have heard about that, given that I work there. In any event, Britain reacted in the way Britain often does to this sort of thing, by taking the piss through the #foxnewsfacts hashtag on Twitter. There are some real gems on there, although one would have to be either British or something of an Anglophile to appreciate some of the references.
But the reason I'm actually posting this is to note that, while Fox has a generally rather dubious record for factual accuracy (Obama banning doughnuts, anyone?), I find it a bit worrying that this guy's credentials as an "expert" have allowed him to address Congressional committees, even though he clearly gets some of his information from tinfoil-hat conspiracy websites. I can't imagine where else the info came from, given his claim he'd accepted it as truth from his sources.