At the end of the day, she was one of those people who preached all of these wonderful sentiments of hard work and self-sufficiency and praising the working class, yet pursuing policies that did nothing but harm them in order to line the pockets of the wealthy, much like all the neocons who were the successors of her and Reagan. Simultaneously, while she is lauded by some for supporting some gay rights measures in the 60s, she was one of those people always standing against "government" in economic matters, but perfectly happy to use government as a club against people she didn't like, passing measures like Section 28 that attacked gays directly. Her actions speak louder than words, and she did tons of harm to working families, labor unions, feminism, gays and other minorities. On top of that, she supported Pinochet and the aparthied regime in South African, calling Nelson Mandela a "terrorist." She did a couple good things: it was supposedly her influence on Reagan that made him so open to talks with Gorbechev in good faith, advancing detente likely far more quickly than it would have happened on its own. She acknowledged climate change and supported action to combat it. But like the Doctor said in "The Impossible Astronaut" when reminded that Nixon did some good things: "Not nearly enough."
Here's someone waxing on about Thatcher and her legacy: class warfare and the Tea Party.
http://www.nationalmemo.com/her-tea-par ... the-world/